Express Indemnity:
- This is also known as written indemnity. Under this, all the terms and conditionsof the indemnity are mentioned specifically in the contract.
- The rights and the liabilities of both parties are clearly set out in the agreement.
- This type of agreement includes insurance indemnity contracts, construction contracts, agency contracts, etc.
- It refers to that indemnity wherein the obligation arises from the facts and the conduct of the parties involved. This is not a written contract.
- The core example of this type of indemnity is the master-servant relationship.
- The master is liable to indemnify his servant for the losses that he incurred while working as per his instruction.
Rights of an Indemnity Holder
Section 125 of Indian contract Act, 1872 deals with rights of an indemnity holder. The promisee in a contract of indemnity, acting within the scope of his authority, is entitled to recover from the promisor:
- All damages which he may be compelled to pay in any suit in respect of any matter to which the promise to indemnify applies.
- All costs which he may be compelled to pay in any such suit if, in bringing or defending it, he did not contravene the orders of the promisor, and acted as it would have been prudent for him to act in the absence of any contract of indemnity, or if the promisor authorized him to bring or defend the suit;
- All sums which he may have paid under the terms of any compromise of any such suit, if the compromise was not contrary to the orders of the promisor, and was one which it would have been prudent for the promisee to make in the absence of any contract of indemnity, or if the promisor authorized him to compromise the suit.
Rights of the Indemnifier
- After the indemnity holder is paidfor the damage incurred, the compensator shall have all the rights to all the methods and services which can save the compensator from the damage.
- Indemnification can only be done if the loss to the other party is incurred, or if it is certain that the loss will be incurred.
- The Indian Contract Act of, 1872 does not provide for the time to commence the liability of the indemnifier under the contract.
- In Gajanan Moreshwar vs. Moreshwar Madan, (1942), the Bombay High Court held that if the indemnified has incurred liability and the liability is absolute, he is entitled to call upon the indemnifier to save him from the liability and pay it off.
- In Lala Shanti Swarup vs Munshi Singh & Others, (1967), the Supreme Court held that a conveyance which contains a covenant whereby the purchaser promises to pay off encumbrances on the sold property is nothing but an implied contract of indemnity, whose cause of action arises when actually indemnified. (Mortgage decree being passed does not amount to actual indemnification).
Contract of Guarantee